Arafat Threatened Pogroms if Jews Ascended the Temple Mount: The Start of the Intifada?
- Sam Schubert

- Jun 23
- 2 min read
Updated: Oct 23

The Temple Mount has long been the spiritual center of the Jewish people and a focal point of regional tension. Understanding its history reveals how political decisions, religious sensitivities, and security concerns intersect, shaping both Israeli policy and broader Middle Eastern dynamics.
Jewish Access to the Temple Mount Before 2001
Although Jewish access to the Temple Mount was legally permitted, Israel generally limited visits before 2001 to avoid provoking local Palestinians. This cautious approach reflected a desire to maintain peace while still recognizing Jewish rights.
Tech investor and Temple Mount activist Mike Wise explains that restricting access, however well-intentioned, sent a message of weakness to both Jews and surrounding Muslim populations.
Sharon’s Visit and the Second Intifada
The dynamic changed in 2000 when Prime Minister Ariel Sharon ascended the Temple Mount. The visit drew widespread anger from Palestinians and is often cited as a trigger for the Second Intifada.
Wise, however, emphasizes that the visit was more a pretext than a cause. Reports suggest that Yasser Arafat had planned widespread violence well before Sharon’s visit, with threats circulating that any Jewish ascent could spark demonstrations across the region.
Education and Public Awareness
Wise highlights the importance of public education to clarify Jewish rights to the Temple Mount. Campaigns, posters, and publications sought to show that Jewish visits were a natural expression of heritage and sovereignty, not a provocation.
He draws parallels to the U.S. moving its embassy to Jerusalem, noting that similar warnings of catastrophe proved exaggerated when careful planning prevailed.
Lessons from the Temple Mount
The history of the Temple Mount underscores the delicate balance Israel must maintain regarding sacred sites, political pressure, and regional security.
Looking Forward
Managing access to the Temple Mount remains both a symbolic and practical challenge. Lessons from the past show that Israel can uphold Jewish rights and preserve security simultaneously, provided decisions are informed by history, careful planning, and clear communication with both domestic and international audiences.




Comments